Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Philosophy - Essay ExampleTheir dead on target forms, in Platos mind, atomic number 18 permanent, eternal, and nonphysical.According to Plato, because sensory objects are not completely real, the empirical kingdom of existent objects is not real. As such, any beliefs people derive from their buzz off with these objects are unclear and undependable however, the principles of philosophical system and mathematics, both of which are discovered by dint of inner meditation on the Forms. These principles, according to Plato, represent the solely true knowledge.After taking Platos views and descriptions of Forms, true knowledge is an attainable trait. Additionally, Plato asserted that knowledge is composed of ii essential characteristics truety and genuine presence. Essentially, knowledge must be infallible and certain there potty be no room for interpretation or misunderstanding. True knowledge must be fool-proof and unwavering. Additionally, knowledges alike(p) object must be ge nuinely real as opposed to those objects that are present in appearance only. Because that which is fully real must, for Plato, be fixed, permanent, and unchanging, he identified the real with the ideal realm of existence as opposed to the physical world of becoming (Plato, 2007, 9).These views willed in Platos... t to Platos certain view of knowledge, Plato believed that those propositions derived through sensory subsist have a high degree of probability and as such, this experience cannot be certain. Additionally, the objects in the empirical realm, such as trees, are ever-changing phenomenon they do not remain tenacious and, therefore, the experiences will not remain constant. Platos Republic contains his distinction between both levels of human awareness. These two levels are opinion and knowledge. According to Plato, any claims brought about by a persons experience in the empirical realm with a tangible object are classified as opinions only. Regardless if these opinions a re founded on a solid base or not, opinions do not merit genuine knowledge.Knowledge, considered to be the higher of the two levels of awareness, entails logic and reasoning rather than experience. Logic and reasoning, if used correctly, will lead to intellectual insights. These insights are certain and, consequently, infallible. According to Plato, the representative objects of these intellectual insights are the eternal and permanent Forms.Therefore, according to Plato, the relationship between experience and knowledge is a complicated one. Experience does not, directly, lead to knowledge or equate to knowledge because experience is fallible and unreliable. One person may experience an event differently than another. What a person experiences at one time with a tangible object may change at a subsequent time because tangible objects remain in a state of perpetual change. Alone, experience will result in the formulation of a persons opinions regarding an object.However, if logic a nd reasoning is applied to a persons experience, that person can pass around a true knowledge about that object, and