Death Sentence of Saddam Hussein Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Death Sentence of Saddam ibn Talal Hussein - Case Study congresswomanAgainst the nature of the trial. Most seem to agree that the trial was hugely unfair to Hussein, the appraises were under press to reach a guilty verdict the defense (Or at least that part of it that was not killed ahead the end of the trial) was not given all of the facts, and the death sentence was speedily carried out without adequate condemnation for appeal.While issues such as the death penalty are clearly procedural, the allegation that the verdict was pre-arranged, and no adequate proof of Saddams guilt was provided, fall into the category of Substantive law.The defendants were charged with committing Murder, torture, forced displacement, and unlawful captivity (Human Rights Watch, 2006). However, because the charges were so vague (Ibid) some feel that Saddam was instead, convicted of Crimes against Humanity An offence against international equity for which Iraki law stipulates no penalty (Kadri, 2007 ).Those picked to hear the case were Kurds and Shiites, effectively excluding those of Husseins own ethnic group. A judge was appointed with a conflict of interest, as he came from Halabja (mathaba, 2006)International human rights activists are concerned that the trial of Hussein over Dujail prevented Saddams other victims from presenting their cases. Not only were these cases more provable, but the United States and the United Kingdom were substantially involved in these crimes. International LawThere are two essential pieces of International Law which have been violated by the trial and death Sentence of Saddam HusseinThe Universal declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)The right of everyone to competent tribunals (Article 8)The right of everyone to a fair and public hearing by an breakaway and impartial tribunal (Article 10)The right of eve